The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University and Freedom of the Press Foundation filed a lawsuit after the government failed to disclose critical portions of its internal guidelines relating to the surveillance of journalists.
The lawsuit follows Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ recent statement that the Justice Department currently has 27 open leak investigations, nine times as many investigations as last year.
“The apparent hostility toward the press from senior government officials combined with increasing government surveillance create a dangerous environment for reporters and whistleblowers,” said Knight Institute Staff Attorney Carrie DeCell. “The public has a right to know if the limits on surveillance of journalists are sufficient to ensure a free press.”
In October, the Knight Institute and Freedom of the Press Foundation filed Freedom of Information Act requests with the Justice Department, the National Security Agency, the CIA, and other federal agencies, seeking records concerning the surveillance of journalists and other investigative tactics that threaten the freedoms of speech, association, or the press.
The organizations are particularly interested in uncovering any relevant revisions to the Justice Department’s “Media Guidelines,” which, notably, contain media subpoena policies that Attorney General Sessions indicated last August he wanted to revisit.
The Knight Institute and Freedom of the Press Foundation also sought any revisions to the FBI Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide (known informally as the “DIOG”) that concern the use of secret “national security letters.”
Apparently not subject to the Media Guidelines, national security letters may be used to compel a third party (such as a cell phone provider) to disclose customer records (such as a journalist’s call log).
In 2016, the news organization The Intercept published leaked portions of the DIOG indicating that FBI agents have been secretly authorized to obtain journalists’ phone records with the approval of only two internal officials.
Emails released to the Freedom of Press Foundation indicated that these portions of the DIOG may since have been updated, although any updates remain secret.
“The fact that the Justice Department has completely exempted national security letters from the Media Guidelines and can target journalists with them in complete secrecy is an affront to press freedom,” said Trevor Timm, executive director of Freedom of the Press Foundation. “There’s absolutely no reason why these secret rules should not be public.”
The organizations intend to publish any records disclosed as a result of their lawsuit.
During the election campaign, President Trump called journalists an “enemy of the people” and derided media organizations he didn’t like as “fake news.”
Since the new administration took office, attacks on journalists have become alarmingly common.
Dan Heyman, a reporter for the Public News Service in West Virginia was arrested and charged with a crime after he repeatedly attempted to question Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price, who was walking through a hallway in the state Capitol with Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway.
John M. Donnelly, a senior writer at CQ Roll Call, was manhandled by security guards at the Federal Communications Commission, then forced out of the agency’s headquarters as he tried to ask questions of FCC Commissioner Michael O’Rielly after a news conference.
Republican Greg Gianforte, was charged with misdemeanor assault for body-slamming Ben Jacobs, a reporter for The Guardian, on the night before a hotly contested special House election in Montana.
While these are just a few examples, the real targets of Trump’s war on journalism are government officials who provide the news media information for stories exposing incompetence, corruption and foul play.
Connect with NJTODAY.NET
Join NJTODAY.NET's free Email List to receive occasional updates delivered right to your email address!