NJ Wastes Millions On Unnecessary Clothing Allowance Payments

STATE — New Jersey pays thousands of white-collar state employees an annual uniform-maintenance stipend, yet nearly half of those employees do not wear a uniform, according to a report released this week by the Office of the State Comptroller.

A survey found that 48 percent of white-collar employees receiving the $700 annual payment do not wear uniforms or other specialized work clothing. Clothing maintenance payments to employees not subject to clothing requirements totaled more than $3 million this fiscal year.


“The state spends millions of dollars every year to cover the cost of uniforms for state employees who don’t actually wear uniforms,” State Comptroller Matthew Boxer said. “It’s absurd.”

Eligibility for the clothing allowance benefit is governed by collective bargaining agreements entered into by the state. The current collective bargaining agreements span the period July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2011.

The report also found that New Jersey’s clothing allowance policies are far more generous than those of other states reviewed. For example, rather than provide reimbursements for actual clothing expenses, New Jersey provides a flat $700 payment in payroll checks once a year. The state does not require its employees to present a receipt or other proof of purchase in order to receive the allowance.

Of the seven other states reviewed– New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Maryland, Connecticut and California – only California provides clothing allowances greater than $175, according to collective bargaining agreements. California will reimburse its employees up to $450 a year if the expense is substantiated by a receipt. Pennsylvania pays up to a $175 clothing allowance and New York pays a $58 allowance to employees in a limited number of job titles.

In interviews conducted by Office of the State Comptroller, administrators at five different New Jersey state departments confirmed that clothing allowances are provided to department employees who are not required to wear uniforms or special clothing. A human resources manager at the Department of Transportation said the allowance “is more or less looked at as a bonus.”

The report recommends the state seek to eliminate clothing allowance payments for employees who are not required to wear uniforms or other special clothing. It also recommends that any clothing allowance compensation be more transparent, noting that clothing allowance eligibility is governed by multiple agreements, side agreements and agreements that reference terms from yet other agreements.

“Figuring out who exactly is entitled to these payments should not be so complicated,” Boxer said.

Connect with NJTODAY.NET

Join NJTODAY.NET's free Email List to receive occasional updates delivered right to your email address!
Email ads@njtoday.net for advertising information Send stuff to NJTODAY.NET Like Us On Facebook Follow Us On Twitter Download this week's issue of NJTODAY.NET
Print Friendly, PDF & Email